WEKO3
アイテム
ランドスケープ概念の再検討のために — 人びとと環境とのかかかわりとランドスケープ —
https://doi.org/10.20569/00005156
https://doi.org/10.20569/0000515683ff5de7-9a81-4c6b-a6a7-6b4e35fe4aa3
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
kbj75(1) (908.7 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2020-10-05 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | ランドスケープ概念の再検討のために — 人びとと環境とのかかかわりとランドスケープ — | |||||||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | For Reconsidering the Concept of Landscape | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Landscape | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Environment | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Taskscape | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Tim Ingold | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Kenneth Olwig | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.20569/00005156 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
和泉, 浩
× 和泉, 浩
× IZUMI, Hiroshi
|
|||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this paper is to reconsider the concept of landscape in order to find a clue to clarify the relationships and standpoints of various perspectives on landscape that make the term extraordinary confusing and fascinating. Relatively recent discussions on landscape tend to stress movement, motion, becoming and bodily experiences, and refuse its visual aspect based on its etymology: ‘scape’ is not related to ‘scope’. This paper examines the discussions of Tim Ingold ‘The Temporality of the Landscape’ (1993), Paul Rodaway, Sensuous Geography (1994), and Kenneth R. Olwig ‘Recovering the Substantive Nature of Landscape’ (1996). All of them are published in 1990s, but influential or important in subsequent discussions and considerations on landscape. Rodaway’s definition of landscape stresses its visual aspect, Olwig’s etymological and historical study of landscape insists on its relations to community, custom, political and cultural identity, and Ingold deconstructs landscape focused on its temporality. This paper argues the visual aspect of landscape is worth to reconsider, and to discern various multiple paths and relationships between person and environment, definition of landscape focused on visual aspect is indispensable, and to identify environment as environment, detached, reflexive stance and experience are necessary. Landscape can be conceived as a way of detachment or experiences of detachment based on the visual. | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
秋田大学教育文化学部研究紀要 人文科学・社会科学 号 75, p. 1-10, 発行日 2020-03-01 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 2433-4979 | |||||||||
| NCID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12812348 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 秋田大学教育文化学部 | |||||||||
