WEKO3
アイテム
協働の形態が洞察的問題解決に及ぼす影響 －数理パズル「タングラム」を用いた検討－
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/2933
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/293301ae5c50-115c-4b08-a934-05e5f6359a0c
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
jis37(159).pdf (2.1 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2015-09-09 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 協働の形態が洞察的問題解決に及ぼす影響 －数理パズル「タングラム」を用いた検討－ | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Effects of Collaboration Styles on Insightful Problem Solving : Using the Puzzle Game of“ Tangram”. | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 主題 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 協働的問題解決 | |||||
| 主題 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 洞察問題 | |||||
| 主題 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | タングラム | |||||
| 主題 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 協働の形態 | |||||
| 主題 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 制約緩和 | |||||
| 主題 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Collaborative problem solving | |||||
| 主題 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Insight problem | |||||
| 主題 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Tangram | |||||
| 主題 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Collaboration style | |||||
| 主題 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Constraint relaxation | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 作成者 |
児玉, 佳一
× 児玉, 佳一× 中野, 良樹× KODAMA, Keiichi× NAKANO, Yoshiki |
|||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of collaboration styles on insight problem solving. We used a puzzle game called“ Tangram.” Tangram is a game that is consisted of seven pieces of triangles and squares, and is considered as one kind of insight problem. Participants（N ＝75）were randomly assigned to either solo condition, collaborative pair condition, or parallel pair condition, and were required to arrange the pieces to the shape of a“lion.”In the solo condition, participants were asked to solve a Tangram alone. In the collaborative pair condition, participants were given one Tangram per pair and were asked to solve it together. In the parallel pair condition, participants were given two Tangrams per pair and were able to solve it individually while having discussions. The result indicated that the collaboration styles did not significantly affect the complete rate and the complete time. However, it had significant effect on the constraint relaxation rate and the content of the conversations. Finally, we discussed the result and implication for collaborative learning using Tangram. |
|||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
秋田大学教育文化学部教育実践研究紀要 巻 37, p. 159-171, 発行日 2015-03-01 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 13449214 | |||||
| NCID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11532120 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 秋田大学教育文化学部附属教育実践研究支援センター | |||||
