ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 30 理工学研究科・理工学部(含:旧鉱山・工学資源学部)
  2. 30B 本学紀要
  3. 30B1c 秋田大学大学院工学資源学研究科研究報告
  4. 第34号 (30B1c)

- The Language "Noticing" Hypothesis - Towards Effective Teaching Methods in Japan

http://hdl.handle.net/10295/2359
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/2359
198e87d9-94c1-4c60-a74e-2e40f8bfe7e2
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
kougaku34(29).pdf kougaku34(29).pdf (841.6 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2014-04-14
タイトル
タイトル - The Language "Noticing" Hypothesis - Towards Effective Teaching Methods in Japan
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
作成者 OLAGBOYEGA, Kolawole Waziri

× OLAGBOYEGA, Kolawole Waziri

OLAGBOYEGA, Kolawole Waziri

Search repository
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 This paper is a contribution to a continued exploration of what Language “Noticing” Hypothesis has to offer the language teachers and learners in Japan. The paper explores the hypothesis and examines the effectiveness of the method in an EFL context such as Japan. Debates on language teaching methods tend to fall into oppositional views. Since the early ages of English Language Teaching in Japan, yakudoku (grammar-translation) method has been the “vogue”. The method, on the other hand, has been criticized in the last 20 years for failing to produce learners with high level of proficiency in English. The criticism often leads to a demand for more emphasis on “output” or “communicative language teaching” (CLT). Reviewing the previous research on input and output, some scholars suggest that output is necessary for language acquisition (e.g. Swain’s ‘Output Hypothesis’) while some claim that language acquisition occurs only through input (e.g. Krashen’s ‘Input Hypothesis’). However, some recent approaches try to link input with output in a dynamic mechanism of second language acquisition by adapting the factors of ‘noticing’, which is theorised as ‘Noticing Hypothesis’ by R. Schmidt. The factors are also related to ‘implicit teaching’ and ‘explicit teaching’ in language classrooms. This paper outlines Schmidt’s hypothesis about noticing and explores how the hypothesis could be adapted to the real teaching contexts. The paper concludes that input/output and implicity/explicity should not be discussed as opposites but should be seen as complementary teaching approaches.
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
書誌情報 秋田大学大学院工学資源学研究科研究報告
en : Scientific and technical reports of Graduate school of Engineering and Resource Science, Akita University

巻 34, p. 29-35, 発行日 2013-10-31
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 21861382
NCID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AA12500403
出版者
出版者 秋田大学大学院工学資源学研究科
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-07-25 11:16:29.729625
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3