WEKO3
アイテム
自由心証主義と「証明」
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/1749
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/17498ed155db-2c07-45b8-b36d-ee23310baa09
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
kbj65(11).pdf (3.1 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2011-09-15 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 自由心証主義と「証明」 | |||||||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | The Principle of the Free Discretion of Judges as to the Probative Value of Evidence and 'the Degree of Proof | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | the Code of Crimical Procedure | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | the law of evidence | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | proof | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | confession | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | the free conviction principle | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
西台, 満
× 西台, 満
× NISHIDAI, Michiru
|
|||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | According to the common view in the Criminal Law Society of Japan,the probative values of most evidences were fixed in advance by law in the age of feudalism. The modern period,however,tumed it over and secured the freedom of judges to estimate the value of each evidence. We nowadays call the freedom the free conviction principle. '1,on the other hand,believe that the view is wrong. It was only the confessions,but not most evidences,the value of which were rated by law. The confession was rated very high and required to find the accused guilty of a crime. The judge could declare the accused guilty with confidence,that is to say,feeling relieved thanks to it. Butthe criminal procedure that doesn't dispense with a confession inevitably involved the torture.The enlightenment thought in the period of citizens' revolutions first of all attacked the torture as a typical violation of human rights. It was the free conviction principle that made its appearance in the criminal suit to bring the torture to an end. In other words,the criminallaw at that time abandoned to place such a high value on the confession as to be a necess紅y condition for a judgment of guilty. | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
秋田大学教育文化学部研究紀要 人文科学・社会科学 巻 65, p. 11-18, 発行日 2010-03-01 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1348527X | |||||||||
| NCID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11458593 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 秋田大学教育文化学部 | |||||||||
