WEKO3
アイテム
神の存在･非存在を巡って
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/894
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/8940c055263-809f-4867-9bff-4e0f5179e88f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
tachibana7.pdf (889.9 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2008-07-04 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 神の存在･非存在を巡って | |||||||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | On the Existence/Non-Existence of God | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 神の存在 | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 多神論 | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 一神論 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
立花, 希一
× 立花, 希一
× TACHIBANA, Kiichi
|
|||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | In this paper we pursue our arguments as follows: I. Since the ancient times some have insisted that God exists and others have denied this. God and existence are firmly connected. However, we cannot answer the question whether something exists or not unless we know what it is. Therefore, we have to consider what God is before we decide whether God exists or not. IT. Comparison of polytheism and monotheism. God of monotheism and gods of polytheism are incompatible with each other and mutually exclusive. Thus the Japanese word "kami" which means both God and gods is the source of misunderstandings. ill. On Descartes' ontological argument for the existence of God. N. On Kant's argument of the impossibility of the ontological argument. Kant definitely distinguished existence from predicates. V. On the influence upon modern symbolic logic by Kant's argument. In modern symbolic logic the symbol for existential quantifier is utterly different from the symbols for predicates. VI. On Quine's thesis, "To be is to be the value of a variable." Though Quine denies the existence of mental states or of Homeric gods, this denial dose not follow from his thesis but is based on his physicalist ontology. W. Concluding remarks: Quine dose not exclude the possibility that God is the value of a variable. In the world of story, God does exist as Snow White exists. We may live in a richly diverse world. |
|||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
秋田大学教育学部研究紀要 人文科学・社会科学 en : Memoirs of the College of Education, Akita University. The humanities & the social sciences 巻 47, p. 1-12, 発行日 1995-01-20 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 03870103 | |||||||||
| NCID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00010293 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 秋田大学教育学部 | |||||||||
