WEKO3
アイテム
批判的合理主義と汎批判的合理主義の齟齬:反証主義の視点から
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/883
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/883fc3fd445-2bf4-45b9-8d2a-25dff423a323
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
tachibana5.pdf (576.6 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2008-07-02 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 批判的合理主義と汎批判的合理主義の齟齬:反証主義の視点から | |||||||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | Some Conflicts between Critical Rationalism and Pancritical Rationalism: From a Falsificationist Point of View | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 批判的合理主義 | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 反証主義 | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Popper | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | ポパー | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
立花, 希一
× 立花, 希一
× TACHIBANA, Kiichi
|
|||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | In 1962 W.W. Bartley proposed comprehensively critical rationalism-thereafter he renamed it as pancritical rationalism (PCR)-in order to overcome some problems which he saw in Popper's critical rationalism (CR). Since then it has been discussed whether PCR is a better version of CR or not. The thesis of pancritical rationalism is : "The position may be held rationally without needing justification at all-provided that it can be and is held open to criticism and survives severe examination." As you see in the sentence quoted above, he thinks that in PCR it is rational to hold a position if it survives severe criticism. This is a condition of rationality in PCR. In my opinion, this condition of rationality in PCR clashes with the first of the conditions of rationality in CR or at least PCR neglects the rest. The conditions of rationality in CR are as follows: (1) it is rational to reject a position if it is refuted by severe criticism; (2) it is rational just to conjecture; (3) it is rational to give a significant challenge to a survived position. They are implicit both in falsificationism and in CR which is based on falsificationism. Therefore, PCR has an undesirable element which CR does not have, if you evaluate falsificationism positively. |
|||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
秋田大学教育学部研究紀要 人文科学・社会科学 en : Memoirs of the College of Education, Akita University. The humanities & the social sciences 巻 51, p. 19-26, 発行日 1997-03-27 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 03870103 | |||||||||
| NCID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00010293 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 秋田大学教育学部 | |||||||||
