WEKO3
アイテム
個体化と社会化 -J.G.フィヒテの哲学にみられる自己実現観について-
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/843
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/8432cdd5639-746f-4a60-ac66-4da271677591
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2008-06-19 | |||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||
タイトル | 個体化と社会化 -J.G.フィヒテの哲学にみられる自己実現観について- | |||||||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||||||
その他のタイトル | Individualization and Socialization --J..G.Fichte's though tupon the way of Building-up-Humanity.- | |||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||
主題 | ||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
主題 | フィヒテ | |||||||||
主題 | ||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
主題 | Fichte | |||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
作成者 |
池田, 全之
× 池田, 全之
× IKEDA, Takeyuki
|
|||||||||
内容記述 | ||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
内容記述 | When we read Surveillance and Purnischment whose author is Michel Foucault (one of the most famous post-modern philosophers), we can't but be shocked. Because he insists that the socialization of human beings means only process through which the inner lives of individuals are disciplined craftly. Moreover, according to him, school is one of the most representative systems for such disciplin. Is the proposition 'Self-realization of individual is equal with ideal socialization' only fantasy today? In this paper I inquire this question of J. G. Fichte's philosophy. In his earlier philosophy, he adovocates that we should make efforts endlessly in order to realize our absolute freedom by ourselves. And he supposes appeal (Aufforderung) which is caused by others as the indispensable condition to do so. In short, Fichte's earlier philosophy is not only ethical anthropology, in which the value of human freedom is emphasized ardently, but also social theory. On the contrary, in his later philosophy, he is convinced that the absolute exists in the foundation of human existence, and that ideal way of life is to live its own life intently as a reflection (Bild) of the absolute. But in spite of such structural change of his thought, the conviction 'autonomy of individual is directly linked to the construction of ideal society' persists firmly. If we cofront such Fichte's thought with Foucault's polemic against classical framework of pedagogical thinking, we can still give support to the former. Because CD it attachs importance to individual performance, @ it refuses easy totalization, (in these viewpoints Foucault would agree with Fichte), and CID it presents positively the goal of Building-up-Humanity. CFoucault can't indicate it clearly and it would be serious fault, when some educational theory should be thought out on the strength of his philosophy.) I'm sure that the importance of Fichte's philosophy still remains even after post-modern philosophy declares the invalidity of the paradigms presented by classical philosophy. |
|||||||||
出版タイプ | ||||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
書誌情報 |
秋田大学教育学部研究紀要 教育科学 号 53, p. 35-44, 発行日 1998-03-01 |
|||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
収録物識別子 | 03870111 | |||||||||
NCID | ||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
収録物識別子 | AN00010271 | |||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||
出版者 | 秋田大学教育学部 |