WEKO3
アイテム
知識と自己形成 -後期フィヒテの知識学における｢概念の自己否定｣について-
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/839
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/839b95b3d12-cc4f-4e65-96e8-c381d715735f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ikeda2.pdf (988.9 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2008-06-19 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 知識と自己形成 -後期フィヒテの知識学における｢概念の自己否定｣について- | |||||||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | Knowledge and Self-formation -On`the self-negation of concept' in the later Doctrine of the Science of J.G.Ficht | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 後期フィヒテ | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | later Fichte | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 自己否定 | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | フーコー | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
池田, 全之
× 池田, 全之
× IKEDA, Takeyuki
|
|||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | The idea 'the endless progress of humanbeing for the purpose of realizing the sole absolute ideal is good' (grand theory) comes to be doubted now a day. In such a state of thought, people are recommended to enrich their lives in their own situations in which they themselves are put. Michel Foucault calls this way of life 'the aesthetics of existence'. Of course, his thought is denounced for example by Frankfurt school. To be sure, its criticism should be ratified. Since it is impossible to restore grand theory, however, we can't forsake easily the clue presented by Foucault to the method of enriching our own lives. To enrich individual life--how should this ideal be considered? In order to solve this question, I dare to throw back this Foucault's thought into the context of German Idealism (as the representation of modern subjectivism), because it contains the later philosophy of F.WJ.Schelling and J.G.Fichte, which aren't included in its straight development toward the Hegel's absolute idealism. In this paper I especially grapple with Fichte's later philosophy which is generally considered as more old-fashioned than Schelling's one. Around his philosophy began to change its feature from anthropology of I (Ich) into the philosophy of religion. During this change Fichte made strong effort to pass the crisis with which his earlier philosophy had been confronted. To put it concretely, this effort was directed to solve the question; What is the lOch) which produces images as they are by itself? And it implies the foundamental question of human-formation; How can we explain the fact that I exist as I am and I become myself? I try to clarify the foundamental structure of selfformation in such a philosophic effort of later Fichte. |
|||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
秋田大学教育文化学部研究紀要 教育科学 号 56, p. 59-68, 発行日 2001-03-01 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 13485288 | |||||||||
| NCID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11458538 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 秋田大学教育文化学部 | |||||||||
