WEKO3
アイテム
対象からの眼差しと原初への思考 -ベンヤミンの言語哲学的思考とメルローポンティの肉の存在論
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/834
http://hdl.handle.net/10295/8345bb66f4c-3e3d-4070-a932-7636974225e8
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ikeda1.pdf (974.8 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2008-06-17 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 対象からの眼差しと原初への思考 -ベンヤミンの言語哲学的思考とメルローポンティの肉の存在論 | |||||||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | Regard from objects and Thinking toward the orlgin - Walter Benjamin's linguistic thought and Maurice Merleau-Ponty's ontology of the "Fresh"- | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | WaIter Benjamin | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Merleau-Ponty | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
池田, 全之
× 池田, 全之
× IKEDA, Takeyuki
|
|||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | If we look back upon 20th century's history of philosophy, we become aware that it is the history through which the violence involved in the modern way of thinking comes to be exposed. And such tendency of 20th century's philosophy is regarded as the radical objection to the German idealistic standpoint about the way of human formation. (German idealists insist that confronted by objects and encompassing them, human subject establishes himself.) However, we are advised from Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno that the theme with which 20th century's philosophy has been grappled can be settled only by serious confrontation with the classic way of thinking. He denounces the modern way of thinking that tends to prompt the reduction of the copious meanings of object to prosaic concepts made by subject. He proposes to exchange it for the "delicacy in thinking (Differenziertheit)" by mean of which we are informed of "the mimic element of recognition". And Adorno borrows this idea from Walter Benjamin. In an early essay, Benjamin makes clear his theme sought throughout his life. It is to find the realm that is neutral from both subject and object. Afterwards he calls this realm "experience" and defines it variously. But those definitions have common origin in Benjamin's own personal experience. In Tree and Speech, he represents his unique experience "doing the ancient marriage of tree and man over again". By the way, in the 20th century's history of philosophy, we find another philosopher who develops his thought about the relationship between subject and object, basing on the same experience as Benjamin's one. In Eye and Spirit, as his fundamental motif, Merleau-Ponty cites a painter's experience as follows: Tree looks at him. To be sure, if we think much of Adorno's criticism against Phenomenology, we can't easily reduce Benjamin's thought with Merleau-Ponty's one to a common measure. But from the fact that they tried to overcome subject-object dualism on the strength of the common elemental experience, can't we receive any precious clues to determine our own attitude against the modern way of thinking? In this paper, I clarify some suggestions that can be found out in their thoughts. |
|||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
秋田大学教育文化学部研究紀要 号 57, p. 13-22, 発行日 2002-03-01 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 03870111 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 秋田大学教育文化学部 | |||||||||
